All code changes are still done in the develop branch.Īt first, it seemed that updates to develop could be merged effortlessly into develop23. The only changes done in develop23 are lots of git mv's and a couple of git rm's. The re-ordering is done in a branch develop23, this will eventually become the new develop branch, but at the moment we are just testing the effect the reordering has on our application and on the EDI.
#Git delete branch in origin how to
Git actually keeps three branches for each branch: the local branch, the remote branch, and a remote-tracking branch usually named origin/branchname. git push -delete origin branchnamehere How to use Git rebase: You can transfer completed work from one branch to another using git rebase. Our development is done in a develop branch. Then, you can use git branch with the -d flag to delete a branch: git branch -d branchname Because of the way Git handles branches, this command can fail under certain circumstances. We are doing some major re-ordering of directories in our git repo. Whether you use GitFlow, GitHub Flow or any other branch driven development strategy, you will inevitably end up with a local Git repository filled with branches you no longer need. I looked at Resolve Git merge conflicts in favor of their changes during a pull, but the answers there don't seem to apply to this particular case. Is there an option to automatically resolve this to their deletion ? I tried git merge origin/develop -strategy-option theirsīut this results in (trimmed) $ git merge origin/develop -strategy-option theirsĬONFLICT (rename/delete): olddir1/src/xxx.cls renamed to newroot/src/xxx.cls in HEAD, but deleted in origin/develop.ĬONFLICT (rename/delete): olddir2/src/yyy.w renamed to newroot/src/yyy.w in HEAD, but deleted in origin/develop.Īutomatic merge failed fix conflicts and then commit the result. How can we make git merge prefer their deletion over our move ?
0 kommentar(er)
